This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Merge C++ conversion into trunk (0/6 - Overview)

From: Marc Glisse <marc dot glisse at inria dot fr>
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Lawrence Crowl <crowl at google dot com>, bonzini at gnu dot org, dj at redhat dot com, rguenther at suse dot de, tromey at redhat dot com, laurynas dot biveinis at gmail dot com
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 22:57:28 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: Merge C++ conversion into trunk (0/6 - Overview)
References: <20120812200427.GA12561@google.com>
Reply-to: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org

On Sun, 12 Aug 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:

For those who would like to build the conversion, you can either
checkout the branch from SVN
(svn://gcc.gnu.org/gcc/branches/cxx-conversion) or get the merged
trunk I have in the git repo (branch dnovillo/cxx-conversion).

The bootstrap changes have already been tested on a wide range of
targets (http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CppBuildStatus).

Hello,

as a matter of policy, is it required that non-gcc compilers can be used to initiate the bootstrap? In the table, clang seems to be the only other compiler that managed. IBM and Oracle both fail (the comment is not clear, but I think 12.3 also fails, just not exactly in the same way), and HP and Intel (to mention just a few) are not listed.

--
Marc Glisse

PS: I never know if it is better to trim Cc: lists in answers or let them grow...

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Merge C++ conversion into trunk (0/6 - Overview)
  - From: Diego Novillo

References:
- Merge C++ conversion into trunk (0/6 - Overview)
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]