This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [SH] PR 39423
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- To: Oleg Endo <oleg dot endo at t-online dot de>
- Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 16:55:09 -0700
- Subject: Re: [SH] PR 39423
- References: <1343602608.2304.15.camel@yam-132-YW-E178-FTW> <5016A826.5040405@redhat.com> <1344463928.2193.45.camel@yam-132-YW-E178-FTW>
On 08/08/2012 03:12 PM, Oleg Endo wrote:
> How about the attached patch?
> Is that way of dealing with the mems OK?
> What could be a possible test case for the alias info issue?
That looks like the right sort of thing.
A test case would have to be for a missed-optimization,
where we failed to schedule one load before another.
It could be very hard to generate one intentionally...
r~