This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFH / Patch] PR 54191

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Cc: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 18:35:24 +0200
Subject: Re: [RFH / Patch] PR 54191
References: <50215C50.2080708@oracle.com> <50225444.60800@oracle.com> <50225FC4.9090008@oracle.com>

On 08/08/2012 02:47 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:

AFAICS, the most uncertain case is the conditional operator test, otherwise we could split the PR.

Turned out to be really trivial: a missing check for error_mark_node in build_conditional_expr_1.

I'll send in a separate message a complete regtested patch + testcase covering all the tests unrelated to instantiation dependent.

Paolo.

References:
- [RFH / Patch] PR 54191
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [RFH / Patch] PR 54191
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [RFH / Patch] PR 54191
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]