This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC / RFH] Re-opened C++/51213 (access control under SFINAE)

On 08/01/2012 02:57 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote: 
So, it is possible that when spec != NULL_TREE and we are once more in a
SFINAE context, we have to actually call perform_deferred_access_checks
(complain) and either return error_mark_node or the spec depending on
the return value?

I don't think we need to redo the access check in SFINAE context; we know that there's an error, so we can just return error_mark_node in that case. I guess we should change the name of FNDECL_RECHECK_ACCESS_P to something like FNDECL_HAS_ACCESS_ERRORS to make it clearer.

Jason

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]