This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [rs6000 3/3] Remove MQ

[Please don't top post.]

> Please undo that change.  You made the test for that heavily used
> function even more expensive.

It generates machine code identical to the original.

I suspect David is refering to execution time of the compiler itself 

And I am talking about the machine code of the compiler itself,
generated from the GCC source code before and after my patches:
the gpc_reg_operand function machine code stays bitwise the same.
GCC is a smart enough compiler :-)

Segher

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]