This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Ada] Lock-free implementation of protected objects
> >> Looks good to me, go ahead, although I'm a bit surprised that you got an
> >> error,
> >> can you clarify what error you got?
> >
> > IIRC, that the flag was undefined.
> > If it's important I can revert the fix in my local tree and re-build.
> > Iaim
> No need to do that. Indeed, the flag must be defined for
> all versions of system.ads.
No, as we agreed and discussed, the flag does NOT have to be defined for all
versions of system.ads, so this is a bug that needs to be fixed (precisely
for the issue raised here: we don't want unknown or new ports to be broken
by default).
> Please apply the patch, it
> really seems to be just an oversight.
No, it's not just an oversight, and it's also not obvious as shown by this
discussion.
Arno