This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PR53914, rs6000 constraints and reload queries

From: David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>
To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 15:52:14 -0400
Subject: Re: PR53914, rs6000 constraints and reload queries
References: <20120717153411.GB27761@bubble.grove.modra.org> <201207171629.q6HGTWa0024234@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> <20120719030425.GE27761@bubble.grove.modra.org> <20120719143528.GA3182@bubble.grove.modra.org> <20120720004539.GB3182@bubble.grove.modra.org>

On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> wrote:

> This on the other hand works.  Please consider the patch amended to
> remove mem_operand_fpr, the 'wY' constraint, and uses thereof replaced
> with "m".

What, exactly, is the current proposed patch? Remove offsettable
address constraint from movXX patterns but not from LO_SUM, and not
adding wY constraint?

Thanks, David

References:
- Re: PR53914, rs6000 constraints and reload queries
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: PR53914, rs6000 constraints and reload queries
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: PR53914, rs6000 constraints and reload queries
  - From: Alan Modra

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]