This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] if-to-switch conversion pass

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Steven Bosscher <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>
Cc: Tom de Vries <Tom_deVries at mentor dot com>, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep dot dot dot nop at gmail dot com>, Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, "gcc-patches\ at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:39:43 -0600
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] if-to-switch conversion pass
References: <50054A9C.4030404@mentor.com> <20120718173206.GA8208@mx.loc> <50072AF5.7000108@mentor.com> <CABu31nNezQH2q25KA=K5VJ8SNQae5zr7mGSpoJAZW4nd246srQ@mail.gmail.com>

>>>>> "Steven" == Steven Bosscher <stevenb.gcc@gmail.com> writes:

Steven> Makefile.in is a mess. One of these days, someone (hi, Tromey) will
Steven> hopefully get annoyed enough with this again to finish some tool to
Steven> auto-generate the dependences list. Until that time, let's try to
Steven> avoid proliferating the messy rules from old files to new ones.

I'm hoping to talk Dodji into it ;-)

Seriously, I think the real problem is convincing oneself that the bug
in GNU make has been fixed.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] if-to-switch conversion pass
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

References:
- [PATCH 1/2] if-to-switch conversion pass
  - From: Tom de Vries
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] if-to-switch conversion pass
  - From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] if-to-switch conversion pass
  - From: Tom de Vries
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] if-to-switch conversion pass
  - From: Steven Bosscher

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]