This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] Do not include output.h everywhere

From: Steven Bosscher <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>
To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 12:58:43 +0200
Subject: Re: [patch] Do not include output.h everywhere
References: <CABu31nNUEaE2MaviUgcEG9nQnoCbOOzCALYxPgFpiwYfm7eM2A@mail.gmail.com> <4FC7C4D6.8010905@google.com> <CAFiYyc3O+6_Ftds0wj=rvYEBL0NEik00F8bRJfPSB5HS0AOrMA@mail.gmail.com> <CABu31nNKSSBstw_M=azaoxfzxx2Vj2xXH9k4NSmSSL389-L6BQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAFiYyc0Y3nSrTeRw7ruTD6Rg6iuWP8C+zLts-+2ibivCcrP6zA@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Richard Guenther
<richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
> There is already statistics.h and tree-dump.h, why is dump_file not in
> tree-dump.h for example? ?I admit it's all some of a mess ;)

Because tree-dump.h is about tree dumps (and gimple dumps). Yes, it is a mess.

>?But system.h
> doesn't look right to me.

Fully agreed there.

I'll see if I can come up with a plan to remove some of this mess.

Ciao!
Steven

References:
- Re: [patch] Do not include output.h everywhere
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [patch] Do not include output.h everywhere
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: [patch] Do not include output.h everywhere
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]