This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] dwarf2.h (dwarf_location_atom): Add DW_OP_GNU_addr_index.

From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
To: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at sourceware dot org, ccoutant at google dot com, saugustine at google dot com
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:01:24 +0200
Subject: Re: [RFA] dwarf2.h (dwarf_location_atom): Add DW_OP_GNU_addr_index.
References: <20120418191126.456792461AF@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> <CADPb22Q_xTd+U3HeRtk=6jaQCbGQu=6i1ZFFO=nPhQvkFNqLWA@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>

On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 04:56:17PM -0700, Doug Evans wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Doug Evans <dje@google.com> wrote:
> > This patch adds DW_OP_GNU_addr_index to dwarf2.h.
> >
> > Ok to commit?
> >
> > 2012-04-18 ?Doug Evans ?<dje@google.com>
> >
> > ? ? ? ?* dwarf2.h (dwarf_location_atom): Add DW_OP_GNU_addr_index.

Ok for GCC.
Just a note, we should use 0xff as a GNU opcode escape or something similar
(i.e. 0xff <uleb128> <operands> would be extended opcode) when we reach
that, because we are close to running out of the available range (well,
we could use some 0xeN values too).

	Jakub

References:
- [RFA] dwarf2.h (dwarf_location_atom): Add DW_OP_GNU_addr_index.
  - From: Doug Evans
- Re: [RFA] dwarf2.h (dwarf_location_atom): Add DW_OP_GNU_addr_index.
  - From: Doug Evans

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]