This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] dwarf2.h (dwarf_location_atom): Add DW_OP_GNU_addr_index.

From: Cary Coutant <ccoutant at google dot com>
To: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at sourceware dot org, saugustine at google dot com
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 17:43:15 -0700
Subject: Re: [RFA] dwarf2.h (dwarf_location_atom): Add DW_OP_GNU_addr_index.
References: <20120418191126.456792461AF@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> <CADPb22Q_xTd+U3HeRtk=6jaQCbGQu=6i1ZFFO=nPhQvkFNqLWA@mail.gmail.com>

> Ping.
> This is approved on the binutils side.
> I just need approval on the gcc side.

My understanding is that a patch to sync binutils/include and
gcc/include falls under the "trivial and obvious" rule. True?

-cary

References:
- [RFA] dwarf2.h (dwarf_location_atom): Add DW_OP_GNU_addr_index.
  - From: Doug Evans
- Re: [RFA] dwarf2.h (dwarf_location_atom): Add DW_OP_GNU_addr_index.
  - From: Doug Evans

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]