This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PR c/44774 -Werror=edantic

On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
<lopezibanez@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 22 April 2012 22:09, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net> wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On 04/22/2012 02:42 PM, Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÅez wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Which seems to suggest that we add an option name for each pedwarn
>>>> enabled by default. Is this also what you suggest?
>>>
>>>
>>> I agree with this, and I think that's also what Gaby was suggesting by
>>> "finer-grained".
>>
>> Indeed.
>
> Fine, this makes sense to me. I opened PR c/53075 to track this.
> However, adding one option for each pedwarn is a huge task that seems
> unlikely to be ever completed.

Hmm, I do not think we really need additional option set separately
from the existing
non-generic OPT_Wxxx.
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]