This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [ping 6] [patch] attribute to reverse bitfield allocations (is anyone even reading these?)
- From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
- To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 15:41:58 -0400
- Subject: Re: [ping 6] [patch] attribute to reverse bitfield allocations (is anyone even reading these?)
- References: <201103092245.p29MjZQ5018956@greed.delorie.com> <201107112052.p6BKqICk017576@greed.delorie.com> <201107212223.p6LMNE07001515@greed.delorie.com> <201108221736.p7MHaeqN025057@greed.delorie.com> <201201110556.q0B5uBV9028046@greed.delorie.com> <201201241939.q0OJdvHw005708@greed.delorie.com> <201202131943.q1DJh6ZK011131@greed.delorie.com>
Ping 6...
It's now been over EIGHT MONTHS since I posted the patch, back in
stage 1 for 4.7. Can someone please review and/or approve this before
gcc 4.8's stage 1 is closed? This is needed as a first step for ABI
compatibility for rx-elf.
> Ping 5...
>
> > Ping 4...
> >
> > > Ping 3? It's been months with no feedback...
> > >
> > > > Ping 2 ?
> > > >
> > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg01889.html
> > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg02555.html
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-01/msg00529.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-01/msg01246.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-02/msg00636.html