This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix PRs 52080, 52097 and 48124, rewrite bitfield expansion, enable the C++ memory model wrt bitfields everywhere

On Tue, 27 Mar 2012, Eric Botcazou wrote:

> > I see.  Though the code does not affect layout but only access "layout"
> > for bitfields.  I'm fine with fixing the issues we run into elsewhere,
> > just the langhook is a possibility I had in mind from the start, in
> > case frontends differ in their memory model for bitfields.
> 
> Understood.  According to our internal testing, the issue we're discussing was 
> the last problem introduced by the bitfield change, and I think that using the 
> C/C++ model for C/C++-compatible bit fields is fine for GNAT.
> 
> May I apply the patch I posted?  It boostrapped/regtested fine on x86-64/Linux.

Yes.

Thanks,
Richard.
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]