This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [C++ Patch] PR 52487

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:28:57 -0400
Subject: Re: [C++ Patch] PR 52487
References: <4F689E3A.20805@oracle.com> <4F68D900.2000604@redhat.com> <4F68E506.3050200@oracle.com> <4F68E9F2.7070406@oracle.com> <4F6B3BF1.80806@redhat.com> <4F6B5A25.2020001@oracle.com>

On 03/22/2012 12:58 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:

Anyway, I also think not calling literal_type_p from check_field_decls
if the type is incomplete is pretty ugly, but I'm not sure which is the
best way to make progress

I guess that's OK. Just add a comment explaining that we'll get an error later.

Jason

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 52487
  - From: Paolo Carlini

References:
- [C++ Patch] PR 52487
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 52487
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 52487
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 52487
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 52487
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 52487
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]