This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Patch,AVR]: Fix PR52488 (insane stack usage)


...and now to the right mailing list...

This patch cuts down insane stack offsets for 8-bit SP targets to a value the
involved insns can handle.

Background is that newlib generates such insane offsets (2050 bytes of stack
for a device with 128 bytes of RAM) because of extension PR51345, i.e. new
multilib variants for 8-bit SP targets.

The CFA notes still contain the original size as requested by the source so
that -Wstack-usage= will still work as intended.

The generated code will never be functional, of course, but there should never
be an ICE.

This patch is less aggressive than the patch proposed in the PR, i.e. it is
silent and does not issue an error so that newlib can still be built. If the
user wants additional sanity checking, he has to use -Wstack-usage= or similar
options.

Passed testsuite.

Ok for trunk?

Johann

	PR target/52488
	* config/avr/avr.c (avr_prologue_setup_frame): Cut down stack
	offset (size) to a value the insns can deal with.
	(expand_epilogue): Ditto.

Index: config/avr/avr.c
===================================================================
--- config/avr/avr.c	(revision 185100)
+++ config/avr/avr.c	(working copy)
@@ -827,7 +827,11 @@ avr_prologue_setup_frame (HOST_WIDE_INT
   bool isr_p = cfun->machine->is_interrupt || cfun->machine->is_signal;
   int live_seq = sequent_regs_live ();
 
+  HOST_WIDE_INT size_max
+    = (HOST_WIDE_INT) GET_MODE_MASK (AVR_HAVE_8BIT_SP ? QImode : Pmode);
+
   bool minimize = (TARGET_CALL_PROLOGUES
+                   && size < size_max
                    && live_seq
                    && !isr_p
                    && !cfun->machine->is_OS_task
@@ -933,6 +937,7 @@ avr_prologue_setup_frame (HOST_WIDE_INT
               leaf function and thus X has already been saved.  */
               
           int irq_state = -1;
+          HOST_WIDE_INT size_cfa = size;
           rtx fp_plus_insns, fp, my_fp;
 
           gcc_assert (frame_pointer_needed
@@ -951,6 +956,27 @@ avr_prologue_setup_frame (HOST_WIDE_INT
               my_fp = all_regs_rtx[FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM];
             }
 
+          /* Cut down size and avoid size = 0 so that we don't run
+             into ICE like PR52488 in the remainder.  */
+
+          if (size > size_max)
+            {
+              /* Don't error so that insane code from newlib still compiles
+                 and does not break building newlib.  As PR51345 is implemented
+                 now, there are multilib variants with -mtiny-stack.
+                 
+                 If user wants sanity checks he can use -Wstack-usage=
+                 or similar options.
+
+                 For CFA we emit the original, non-saturated size so that
+                 the generic machinery is aware of the real stack usage and
+                 will print the above diagnostic as expected.  */
+              
+              size = size_max;
+            }
+
+          size = trunc_int_for_mode (size, GET_MODE (my_fp));
+          
           /************  Method 1: Adjust frame pointer  ************/
           
           start_sequence ();
@@ -975,7 +1001,7 @@ avr_prologue_setup_frame (HOST_WIDE_INT
               RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P (insn) = 1;
               add_reg_note (insn, REG_CFA_ADJUST_CFA,
                             gen_rtx_SET (VOIDmode, fp,
-                                         plus_constant (fp, -size)));
+                                         plus_constant (fp, -size_cfa)));
             }
           
           /* Copy to stack pointer.  Note that since we've already
@@ -1003,7 +1029,7 @@ avr_prologue_setup_frame (HOST_WIDE_INT
               add_reg_note (insn, REG_CFA_ADJUST_CFA,
                             gen_rtx_SET (VOIDmode, stack_pointer_rtx,
                                          plus_constant (stack_pointer_rtx,
-                                                        -size)));
+                                                        -size_cfa)));
             }
           
           fp_plus_insns = get_insns ();
@@ -1026,7 +1052,7 @@ avr_prologue_setup_frame (HOST_WIDE_INT
               add_reg_note (insn, REG_CFA_ADJUST_CFA,
                             gen_rtx_SET (VOIDmode, stack_pointer_rtx,
                                          plus_constant (stack_pointer_rtx,
-                                                        -size)));
+                                                        -size_cfa)));
               if (frame_pointer_needed)
                 {
                   insn = emit_move_insn (fp, stack_pointer_rtx);
@@ -1048,7 +1074,7 @@ avr_prologue_setup_frame (HOST_WIDE_INT
               emit_insn (fp_plus_insns);
             }
 
-          cfun->machine->stack_usage += size;
+          cfun->machine->stack_usage += size_cfa;
         } /* !minimize && size != 0 */
     } /* !minimize */
 }
@@ -1261,6 +1287,7 @@ expand_epilogue (bool sibcall_p)
       int irq_state = -1;
       rtx fp, my_fp;
       rtx fp_plus_insns;
+      HOST_WIDE_INT size_max;
 
       gcc_assert (frame_pointer_needed
                   || !isr_p
@@ -1277,6 +1304,13 @@ expand_epilogue (bool sibcall_p)
                   
           my_fp = all_regs_rtx[FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM];
         }
+
+      /* For rationale see comment in prologue generation.  */
+
+      size_max = (HOST_WIDE_INT) GET_MODE_MASK (GET_MODE (my_fp));
+      if (size > size_max)
+        size = size_max;
+      size = trunc_int_for_mode (size, GET_MODE (my_fp));
               
       /********** Method 1: Adjust fp register  **********/
               


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]