This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [C++ Patch] PR 51370

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:55:09 -0500
Subject: Re: [C++ Patch] PR 51370
References: <4F213299.2080803@oracle.com>

On 01/26/2012 06:01 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:

The fix I'm proposing for 4.7.0 seems to me very safe

OK.

but for 4.8 we may
want to revisit these things, maybe we want to keep the invariant that
even in error conditions the arguments are always stored in a TREE_VEC

I think I prefer the current situation of error_mark_node bubbling out like an exception. Along those lines, I would be inclined to replace the TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR with an error_mark_node if the arguments are error_mark_node.

Jason

References:
- [C++ Patch] PR 51370
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]