This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PR lto/51698 and the state of LTO + transactional memory

On 01/24/12 17:24, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 01/25/2012 10:16 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote: 
The attached patch fixes the ICE in the PR, though it won't do what
the user ultimately wants to do, given the limitations described.
Perhaps we could create another PR and tag it with an enhancement
request.

An enhancement request pr sounds good.

Done: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51997

Ok.

Tests revealed minor mismatches in other parts of the testsuite, which I have fixed below.

I would like another approval, just in case you disagree with the way I changed the dummy declarations in the LTO testsuite.

Sorry for the noise, I thought I had it all done :).

Tested on x86-64 Linux.

Attachment: curr
Description: Text document

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]