This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: C++ testsuite PATCH to overhaul running of tests in C++11 mode

On 01/21/2012 06:02 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote: 
Does this mean that the { target c++98 } lines are acceptable in C++11,
while the { xfail c++11 } lines are still errors in C++11, but aren't
detected?

Right.

The reason for asking is that the line:

g<(void (A::*)())&B::f>(); // { dg-error "" }

also fails for C++11 on targets that define TARGET_PTRMEMFUNC_VBIT_LOCATION
to ptrmemfunc_vbit_in_delta.  Is that expected, and if so, is the patch
below OK?  Or should I try to look at it a bit further first?

I'm not sure why that would be, but the patch is OK. I wouldn't worry about trying to get this line right until we fix the other xfails.

Jason

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]