This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [C++ Patch] PR 51379

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 14:00:01 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [C++ Patch] PR 51379
References: <4EFF6BB5.3070507@oracle.com> <4EFF7180.1000708@redhat.com>

Hi,

On 12/31/2011 03:08 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
this implements in a straightforward way the resolution of DR 799 (which
went in CD2): basically a reinterpret_cast to the type of the expression
itself is fine for integral, enumeration, pointer, or pointer-to-member
type. Tested x86_64-linux.
+ else if ((cxx_dialect != cxx98)
This DR should apply to C++98 mode as well.

I suspected that. Thus I'm finishing testing the below instead. Ok?

Thanks,
Paolo.

/////////////////////

Attachment: CL_51379_2
Description: Text document

Attachment: patch_51379_2
Description: Text document

References:
- [C++ Patch] PR 51379
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 51379
  - From: Jason Merrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]