This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [google] Backport r171347 and r181549 from trunk (strict volatile bitfield) (issue5434084)

From: Brendan Conoboy <bconoboy at gmail dot com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 16:04:16 -0800
Subject: Re: [google] Backport r171347 and r181549 from trunk (strict volatile bitfield) (issue5434084)
References: <CABQmnVKVsj9Fjo8M5-YnWLxxtkYNGqKcseFA7Qw=653QrogtDA@mail.gmail.com> <CABQmnVKFYMe7rEwaBYSfMEwaR=csxt-bntPOpqc3VGBownifpg@mail.gmail.com> <20111220223758.GR1957@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com>

On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
> This is ok for 4.6 if it has been sufficiently tested.

Okay!  Is there any testing you'd like to see beyond the
aforementioned success with arm and x86_64 linux?

-Brendan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [google] Backport r171347 and r181549 from trunk (strict volatile bitfield) (issue5434084)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

References:
- Re: [google] Backport r171347 and r181549 from trunk (strict volatile bitfield) (issue5434084)
  - From: Brendan Conoboy
- Re: [google] Backport r171347 and r181549 from trunk (strict volatile bitfield) (issue5434084)
  - From: Brendan Conoboy
- Re: [google] Backport r171347 and r181549 from trunk (strict volatile bitfield) (issue5434084)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]