This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

[C++ Patch] PR 51621

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Cc: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 12:41:31 +0100
Subject: [C++ Patch] PR 51621

Hi,

this ICE - which leads to worse diagnostics - seems caused by a trivial typo: to mean value initialization diagnose_non_constexpr_vec_init is passing zoid_zero_node instead of void_type_node to build_vec_init_elt. My guess is also confirmed by the beginning of the other caller, build_vec_init_expr, which evidently has void_type_node meaning value initialization.

The below tested x86_64-linux.

Thanks,
Paolo.

///////////////////

Attachment: CL_51621
Description: Text document

Attachment: patch_51621
Description: Text document

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 51621
  - From: Jason Merrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]