Re: [patch] PR51347 alias problem

[Patrick Marlier <patrick dot marlier at gmail dot com>]

On 12/11/2011 09:11 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> On 12/10/11 17:13, Patrick Marlier wrote:
> > On 12/10/2011 02:16 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> > > Using the parent node for aliases (as in your patch) makes sense, but I
> > > don't see tree_function_versioning() segfaulting as you claim. What I
> > > see is estimate_function_body_sizes()
> >
> > Humm you are seeing this I guess:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-12/msg00427.html
> >
> > When applied, you should probably see the tree_function_versioning
> > problem.
>
> Indeed. This is what I am seeing. I have applied and committed the patch
> and can no longer reproduce the problem.
>
> Can you verify on your end, and close the bug if appropriate?

Yes the testcase attached in the PR works for me but I can't change the 
status because I am not the reporter (nor admin).

However, the testcase I have added g++.dg/tm/ctor-used.C fails. I can 
fill another PR but I found this problem thanks to the PR testcase.

> Thanks for all your help here.
You are welcome.

Patrick.