This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: CFT: Re: libgcc: why emutls.c in LIB2ADDEH instead of LIB2ADD?
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- To: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter dot nilsson at axis dot com>
- Cc: developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk, bonzini at gnu dot org, jakub at redhat dot com, dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, mrs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:46:24 -0800
- Subject: Re: CFT: Re: libgcc: why emutls.c in LIB2ADDEH instead of LIB2ADD?
- References: <201111220113.pAM1DV4E008011@ignucius.se.axis.com>
On 11/21/2011 05:13 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> * Makefile.in ($(srcdir)/emutls.c): Explain why it's in
> LIB2ADDEH et al.
Definitely ok. ;-)
r~