This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PING 1 [Patch Ada RFA] make sure that multilibs are built with correct s-oscons.ads

From: Iain Sandoe <developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk>
To: Arnaud Charlet <charlet at adacore dot com>
Cc: Thomas Quinot <quinot at adacore dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 15:17:02 +0000
Subject: Re: PING 1 [Patch Ada RFA] make sure that multilibs are built with correct s-oscons.ads
References: <87B813F3-5B28-4F36-A2BD-C0F919D5BE89@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk> <4A925FE3-CA50-44BD-9600-6F460BA401CA@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk> <20111109094949.GA53184@melamine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> <20111109095442.GA79314@adacore.com>

On 9 Nov 2011, at 09:54, Arnaud Charlet wrote:

* Iain Sandoe, 2011-11-07 :

Subject: PING 1 [Patch Ada RFA] make sure that multilibs are built with correct s-oscons.ads
Patch looks fine to me.
It's an official 'OK' then.

Thanks, done (r181319).

May I repeat my question re. 4.6? Since this is a wrong-code situation, I would have thought it eligible for a back-port?

thanks
Iain

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PING 1 [Patch Ada RFA] make sure that multilibs are built with correct s-oscons.ads
  - From: Arnaud Charlet

References:
- PING 1 [Patch Ada RFA] make sure that multilibs are built with correct s-oscons.ads
  - From: Iain Sandoe
- Re: PING 1 [Patch Ada RFA] make sure that multilibs are built with correct s-oscons.ads
  - From: Thomas Quinot
- Re: PING 1 [Patch Ada RFA] make sure that multilibs are built with correct s-oscons.ads
  - From: Arnaud Charlet

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]