This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: repost: [DF] Use HARD_REG_SETs instead of bitmaps


On 11/06/2011 03:19 AM, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:

I understand major hassle is when the register file is big, too much data is being copied on a function call, when it has a HARD_REG_SET as a pass by value parameter. So I did some testing on SPARC, which has the biggest register file I know of, and there is a small performance regression indeed. On the other hand I really like the code reduction in hard-reg-set.h. So how should I proceed? FWIW I'm already testing passing the parameter by reference in the hottest functions.

What about adding a macro indirection to more functions (like you did with SET_HARD_REG_BIT and friends), so that pass-by-value can be changed to pass-by-reference without affecting all the uses throughout the compiler?


Paolo


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]