This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch] 19/n: trans-mem: compiler tree/gimple stuff


Well - we usually don't grab bits off the tree nodes lightly.  Especially if
the cgraph seems to be more fit.

If this is a suggestion, I can put it on my laundry list of future things
todo (after merge, 4.8?, etc).


There are not many consumers of the flag, so fixing it shouldn't be hard.
For 4.7 definitely.

Fair enough.

The following patch puts the bit in the cgraph structure.

There was a comment originally that we may be able to calculate this bit from the CFG, but I'm not sure whether this applies any more, or how much work it would be. I left the comment in.

Tested on x86-64 Linux.

OK for branch?

Attachment: curr
Description: Text document

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]