This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [trans-mem] Avoid ICE with transaction expressions vs constant expressions.

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, Torvald Riegel <triegel at redhat dot com>
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2011 01:54:05 +0100
Subject: Re: [trans-mem] Avoid ICE with transaction expressions vs constant expressions.
References: <4EB484B2.6010409@redhat.com>

Hi,

There we actually two ICEs here -- one with -fgnu-tm that Torvald
pointed me at, and one without -fgnu-tm that I of course stumbled
upon while fumble-fingering the command-line to test the thing.

Committed to branch.

I believe that this:

+    error (keyword == RID_TRANSACTION_RELAXED
+	   ? "%<__transaction_relaxed%>  without transactional memory "
+             "support enabled"
+	   : "%<__transaction_atomic%>  without transactional memory "
+             "support enabled");

isn't translated correctly. Maybe better wrapping the strings in G_().

Paolo.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [trans-mem] Avoid ICE with transaction expressions vs constant expressions.
  - From: Richard Henderson

References:
- [trans-mem] Avoid ICE with transaction expressions vs constant expressions.
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]