This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [top-level patch] Do proper target tool checks for readelf
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
- To: Roland McGrath <mcgrathr at google dot com>
- Cc: newlib at sourceware dot org, binutils at sourceware dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 20:32:44 -0700
- Subject: Re: [top-level patch] Do proper target tool checks for readelf
- References: <x57j8vnyywcb.fsf@frobland.mtv.corp.google.com>
Roland McGrath <mcgrathr@google.com> writes:
> MAINTAINERS doesn't make it entirely clear what the procedure really is for
> touching these files. Looking at src/ChangeLog I see both what appear to
> be instances where changes were first committed to GCC and then merged over
> to src/, and instances where changes were committed directly to src/. I'm
> able to commit (after approval) to src/ CVS, but not to GCC.
The top level is not automatically merged between gcc and src. However,
people are expected to merge manually. Normally gcc is considered to be
the master.
> Ok for src/ trunk, or should somebody be putting this into GCC first?
So, yes, should probably go into gcc first.
Ian