This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [C++ Patch] PR 50956

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 19:48:02 +0100
Subject: Re: [C++ Patch] PR 50956
References: <4EB17B12.1020005@oracle.com> <4EB1819C.6080800@oracle.com> <4EB18B69.7000208@redhat.com>

On 11/02/2011 07:26 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:

On 11/02/2011 01:45 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:

... ehm, we use -Wcast-qual during the bootstrap, thus if I don't want
to break it again, better doing the below too. Seems obvious, by itself.

Yep.

Great, all done. Note for the accidental reader: it's indeed obvious, but only if you are used to the C++ memchr, the two overloads. For the targets (many outside Linux) not providing those (via libc hooks) I would not have broken the bootstrap ;)

Paolo.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 50956
  - From: Jason Merrill

References:
- [C++ Patch] PR 50956
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 50956
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 50956
  - From: Jason Merrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]