Re: RFA: libstdc++ PATCH to initializer_list to #error in C++98 mode

[Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>]

On 10/31/2011 09:17 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 10/31/2011 04:07 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> > On 10/31/2011 08:37 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > I have on occasion been confused by <initializer_list> silently
> > > becoming empty in C++98 mode. OK for trunk?
> > For c++98, I think we should use the usual:
> >
> > #ifndef __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__
> > # include <bits/c++0x_warning.h>
> > #else
> >
> > which we have in place elsewhere. Or we have special reasons for not
> > doing that?
>
> I'd rather not make a libsupc++ header dependent on a header from the 
> main library.  I guess we could move c++0x_warning.h into libsupc++, 
> though...
Sure. Note anyway, that bits/c++config.h is already included, elsewhere 
too in libsupc++.

Paolo