This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [C++-11] User defined literals

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: 3dw4rd at verizon dot net
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:45:37 -0400
Subject: Re: [C++-11] User defined literals
References: <1988108989.8568759.1320079443745.JavaMail.root@vznit170070>

On 10/31/2011 12:44 PM, 3dw4rd@verizon.net wrote:

For string and character literals, we can still just build up a call; we
only need to walk the overload list here for numeric literals.
I found that if you don't walk the overload list for chars, a char could be routed to the operator taking wchar_t for example.

Ah, yes, I was overlooking the bit in the standard that says "S shall contain a literal operator (13.5.8) whose only parameter has the type ch".

The paragraph for string literals doesn't have a similar restriction.

Jason

References:
- Re: Re: [C++-11] User defined literals
  - From: 3dw4rd

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]