This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [trans-mem] wrong calling convention _ITM_free with i*86

From: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>
To: Patrick Marlier <patrick dot marlier at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, rth at redhat dot com, triegel at redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:19:43 -0500
Subject: Re: [trans-mem] wrong calling convention _ITM_free with i*86
References: <4EA1E3C6.5090504@gmail.com> <4EA586F3.4080703@redhat.com>

On 10/24/11 10:40, Aldy Hernandez wrote:

Bootstrapped and tested on i686 with same number of errors.
Sorry to ask you to run more tests, but can you also test x86-64? If
there are no regressions on x86-64 either, OK.

As discussed off-line, I'll run x86-64 tests for you since you don't have a 64-bit available.

Tests finished with no regressions. Feel free to commit.

Thank you.

References:
- [trans-mem] wrong calling convention _ITM_free with i*86
  - From: Patrick Marlier
- Re: [trans-mem] wrong calling convention _ITM_free with i*86
  - From: Aldy Hernandez

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]