This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch,AVR] Print no-return functions as JMP

From: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
To: gerald at pfeifer dot com
Cc: avr at gjlay dot de, chertykov at gmail dot com, eric dot weddington at atmel dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, rth at redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 18:39:39 EDT
Subject: Re: [Patch,AVR] Print no-return functions as JMP
References: <4E972AEF.1020802@gjlay.de> <4E97300E.3070901@redhat.com> <4E973559.9040801@gjlay.de> <4E97367D.9010200@redhat.com> <4E97D75E.1060205@gjlay.de> <4E9851EF.7020808@redhat.com> <4E9861F8.7020903@gjlay.de> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1110141423520.3344@gerinyyl.fvgr>

> +@item -mjump-to-noreturn
> +@opindex mjump-to-noreturn
> +Use a jump instruction instead of a call instruction when calling a
> +no-return functions.  This option is active if optimization is turned
> +on and just affects the way a call instruction is printed out.
> 
> Would "emit" be better here than "printed out"?

Maybe "generated"?

References:
- [Patch,AVR] Print no-return functions as JMP
  - From: Georg-Johann Lay
- Re: [Patch,AVR] Print no-return functions as JMP
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [Patch,AVR] Print no-return functions as JMP
  - From: Georg-Johann Lay
- Re: [Patch,AVR] Print no-return functions as JMP
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [Patch,AVR] Print no-return functions as JMP
  - From: Georg-Johann Lay
- Re: [Patch,AVR] Print no-return functions as JMP
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [Patch,AVR] Print no-return functions as JMP
  - From: Georg-Johann Lay
- Re: [Patch,AVR] Print no-return functions as JMP
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]