This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [C++ Patch / RFC] PR 33067


On 10/10/2011 07:28 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
A GCC user not interested in numerics probably won't care. However, I do not think that extends to people who do care about numerics and have literals in their program. If GCC displays an error message with literals truncated, it is not at clear to the user that GCC is behaving correctly: for one thing, the error might be mysterious and hard to understand, now the compiler is indicating that apparently it does not even parse and understand correctly his or her numbers. How if you have several numbers like that that differs only on the 10th digit? If the user is using an IDE that pattern match the output on the source code, it would be even more confusing (as it is now.)
Would you like to see the max_digits10 - inspired patch for 4.7.0? Again, no strong opinion, just let me know. Personally, I find that too quite a bit better than the current behavior.

Paolo.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]