This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [C++ Patch] PR 34927

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at gmail dot com>
To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at gmail dot com>
Cc: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2011 12:59:58 +0200
Subject: Re: [C++ Patch] PR 34927
References: <4E8F91A0.2030600@oracle.com> <4E9021F7.6010007@redhat.com> <F0418B26-C0F3-4FDA-BF44-BCBC5AB4274C@oracle.com>

> Yes, isn't simply not using a static a rather straightforward alternative?

Ok, now I see: since it's easy, better avoid using *any* sort of flag, I'll do it.

Paolo

References:
- [C++ Patch] PR 34927
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 34927
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 34927
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]