This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch, Fortran, committed] PR 50585: [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with assumed length character array argument

From: Janus Weil <janus at gcc dot gnu dot org>
To: Tobias Burnus <burnus at net-b dot de>
Cc: gfortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2011 11:51:22 +0200
Subject: Re: [Patch, Fortran, committed] PR 50585: [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with assumed length character array argument
References: <CAKwh3qjkW-YXe7pFy8CR5vtt-qJJpeKb6v8WdDK591boFp6rHA@mail.gmail.com> <4E8ECA25.9040308@net-b.de> <CAKwh3qipZE43ZaHJK3XSKK=q37boBPggASEZ=n7ydJAA2F++LQ@mail.gmail.com> <4E8FEEB8.6080006@net-b.de>

> Thanks! What's about the .texi change for -fwhole-file?

Will do. Should I include a note about deprecation? And if yes, do you
have a suggestion for the wording?

Cheers,
Janus

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Patch, Fortran, committed] PR 50585: [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with assumed length character array argument
  - From: Tobias Burnus

References:
- [Patch, Fortran, committed] PR 50585: [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with assumed length character array argument
  - From: Janus Weil
- Re: [Patch, Fortran, committed] PR 50585: [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with assumed length character array argument
  - From: Tobias Burnus
- Re: [Patch, Fortran, committed] PR 50585: [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with assumed length character array argument
  - From: Janus Weil
- Re: [Patch, Fortran, committed] PR 50585: [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with assumed length character array argument
  - From: Tobias Burnus

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]