This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [v3] use NSDMI in C++11 mutex types

From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
Cc: "libstdc++" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 00:43:55 +0100
Subject: Re: [v3] use NSDMI in C++11 mutex types
References: <CAH6eHdSB44AjrtQQYtc2ohXA-_shniFG7n65_UANE354v45UrQ@mail.gmail.com> <20111006151524.663e6761@shotwell>

On 6 October 2011 23:15, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>
>> Does anyone have any comments or objections to going in this
>> direction? ?If the new base classes aren't OK the NSDMI syntax could
>> still be used, just without refactoring to remove the code
>> duplication.
>
> I like where you are going here. This looks good to me.

OK, thanks.  I think I might tackle http://gcc.gnu.org/PR50196 first,
making everything except Timed Mutex types available on Mac OS X, then
come back to this refactoring to use NSDMIs.  That way if the
refactoring needs to be backed out for any reason, we can still keep
the fix for PR 50196, which actually adds functionality rather than
just making the code slightly more portable and maintainable.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [v3] use NSDMI in C++11 mutex types
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

References:
- [v3] use NSDMI in C++11 mutex types
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: [v3] use NSDMI in C++11 mutex types
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]