This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 10:44:03AM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote: > On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 03:23:07PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote: > > On 10/06/2011 03:02 PM, Michael Meissner wrote: > > >On the x86 (with Fedora 13), I built and tested the C, C++, Objective C, Java, Ada, > > >and Go languages with no regressions > > > > >On a power6 box with RHEL 6.1, I > > >have done the same for C, C++, Objective C, Java, and Ada languages with no > > >regressions. > > > > Any reason for not building and testing Fortran? Especially as you > > patch gcc/fortran/{trans*.c,f95-lang.c}? > > > > Tobias > > Brain fault on my part. I tested the previous set of patches with Fortran. > Since I had to explicitly add the languages to pick up Ada and Go, I seemed to > have dropped Fortran. Sigh. Sorry about that. I just started the powerpc > bootstrap, since that is a lot faster. I'm enclosing the revised patches that now provides the Fortran fixes as well. It passes bootstrap and make check on powerpc64-linux based on subversion id 179514. The current top of the tree doesn't bootstrap on x86 if I build go due to an issue with shrinkwrapping and split stack. -- Michael Meissner, IBM 5 Technology Place Drive, M/S 2757, Westford, MA 01886-3141, USA meissner@linux.vnet.ibm.com fax +1 (978) 399-6899
Attachment:
gcc-power7.patch285c
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |