This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Made all the changes. Attaching new patch of updated files. On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Easwaran Raman <eraman@google.com> wrote: > > +static inline hashval_t > +edge_hash_function (unsigned int id1, unsigned int id2) > +{ > + ?/* If the number of functions is less than 1000, this gives a unique value > + ? ? for every function id combination. ?*/ > + ?const int MULTIPLIER = 1000; > + ?return id1* MULTIPLIER + id2; > > Change to id1 << 16 | id2 > > + ?if (edge_map == NULL) > + ? ?{ > + ? ? ?edge_map = htab_create (25, edge_map_htab_hash_descriptor, > + ?edge_map_htab_eq_descriptor , NULL); > > ?Use a ?larger size and don't hardcode the value. > > + ?if (function_map == NULL) > + ? ?{ > + ? ? ?function_map = htab_create (25, function_map_htab_hash_descriptor, > + ?function_map_htab_eq_descriptor , NULL); > > ?Use a ?larger size and don't hardcode the value. > > + ?caller_node = get_function_node (caller); > + ?/* Real nodes are nodes that correspond to .text sections found. ?These will > + ? ? definitely be sorted. ?*/ > + ?set_as_real_node (caller_node); > > This is redundant as set_node_type sets the type correctly. > > + ?if (*slot == NULL) > + ? ?{ > + ? ? ?reset_functions (edge, new_node, kept_node); > + ? ? ?*slot = edge; > + ? ? ?add_edge_to_node (new_node, edge); > > edge will still be in old_node's edge_list I do not have to explicitly delete this as the merged node's edge_list will never be traversed except when cleaning up. > > +static void set_node_type (Node *n) > +{ > + ?void **slot; > + ?char *name = n->name; > + ?slot = htab_find_slot_with_hash (section_map, name, htab_hash_string (name), > + ? INSERT); > > Use htab_find_with_hash or pass NOINSERT. > > + ?/* Allocate section_map. ?*/ > + ?if (section_map == NULL) > + ? ?{ > + ? ? ?section_map = htab_create (10, section_map_htab_hash_descriptor, > + section_map_htab_eq_descriptor , NULL); > > With -ffunction-sections, this should be roughly equal to size of function_map. > > +static void > +write_out_node (FILE *fp, char *name, > + void **handles, unsigned int *shndx, int position) > +{ > + ?void **slot; > + ?slot = htab_find_slot_with_hash (section_map, name, htab_hash_string (name), > + ? INSERT); > > Use htab_find_with_hash or pass NOINSERT. > > Index: function_reordering_plugin/function_reordering_plugin.c > =================================================================== > --- function_reordering_plugin/function_reordering_plugin.c ? ? (revision 0) > +++ function_reordering_plugin/function_reordering_plugin.c ? ? (revision 0) > > + ? ? ? ? ?parse_callgraph_section_contents (section_contents, > (unsigned int)length); > + ? ? ? ?} > + ? ? ?else if (name != NULL) > + ? ? ? ?free (name); > > name should be freed in the body of then and else-if ?as well. > > -Easwaran > On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Sriraman Tallam <tmsriram@google.com> wrote: > > > > *Resending as plain text* > > > > I am attaching a patch of the updated files. This patch was meant for > > the google gcc-4_6 branch. Sorry for not mentioning this upfront in my > > original mail. > > Thanks, > > ?-Sri. > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Sriraman Tallam <tmsriram@google.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Nathan Froyd <nfroyd@mozilla.com> wrote: > > >> > On 9/23/2011 6:03 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >> This patch adds a new linker plugin to re-order functions. > > >> > > > >> > This is great stuff. ?We were experimenting with using the coverage files to > > >> > generate an ordering for --section-ordering-file, but this might be even > > >> > better, will have to experiment with it. > > >> > > > >> > A couple of comments on the code itself: > > >> > > > >> >> Index: function_reordering_plugin/callgraph.h > > >> >> +inline static Edge_list * > > >> >> +make_edge_list (Edge *e) > > >> >> +{ > > >> >> + ?Edge_list *list = (Edge_list *)malloc (sizeof (Edge_list)); > > >> > > > >> > If you are going to use libiberty via hashtab.h, you might as well make use > > >> > of the *ALLOC family of macros to make this and other allocations a little > > >> > neater. > > >> > > > >> >> +/*Represents an edge in the call graph. ?*/ > > >> >> +struct __edge__ > > >> > > > >> > I think the usual convention is to call this edge_d or something similar, > > >> > avoiding the profusion of underscores. > > >> > > > >> >> +void > > >> >> +map_section_name_to_index (char *section_name, void *handle, int shndx) > > >> >> +{ > > >> >> + ?void **slot; > > >> >> + ?char *function_name; > > >> >> + > > >> >> + ?if (is_prefix_of (".text.hot.", section_name)) > > >> >> + ? ?function_name = section_name + 10 /* strlen (".text.hot.") */; > > >> >> + ?else if (is_prefix_of (".text.unlikely.", section_name)) > > >> >> + ? ?function_name = section_name + 15 /* strlen (".text.unlikely.") */; > > >> >> + ?else if (is_prefix_of (".text.cold.", section_name)) > > >> >> + ? ?function_name = section_name + 11 /* strlen (".text.cold.") */; > > >> >> + ?else if (is_prefix_of (".text.startup.", section_name)) > > >> >> + ? ?function_name = section_name + 14 /* strlen (".text.startup.") */; > > >> >> + ?else > > >> >> + ? ?function_name = section_name + 6 /*strlen (".text.") */; > > >> > > > >> > You don't handle plain .text; this is assuming -ffunction-sections, right? > > >> > ?Can this limitation be easily removed? > > >> > > >> You need to compile with -ffunction-sections or the individual > > >> sections cannot be re-ordered. That is why I assumed a .text.* prefix > > >> before every function section. Did you have something else in mind? > > >> > > >> Thanks for your other comments. I will make those changes. > > >> > > >> -Sri. > > >> > > >> > > > >> > I think it is customary to put the comment after the semicolon. > > >> > > > >> > Might just be easier to say something like: > > >> > > > >> > ?const char *sections[] = { ".text.hot", ... } > > >> > ?char *function_name = NULL; > > >> > > > >> > ?for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE (sections); i++) > > >> > ? ?if (is_prefix_of (sections[i], section_name)) > > >> > ? ? ?{ > > >> > ? ? ? ? function_name = section_name + strlen (sections[i]); > > >> > ? ? ? ? break; > > >> > ? ? ?} > > >> > > > >> > ?if (!function_name) > > >> > ? ?function_name = section_name + 6; /* strlen (".text.") */ > > >> > > > >> > I guess that's not much shorter. > > >> > > > >> >> +void > > >> >> +cleanup () > > >> >> +{ > > >> >> + ?Node *node; > > >> >> + ?Edge *edge; > > >> >> + > > >> >> + ?/* Free all nodes and edge_lists. ?*/ > > >> >> + ?for (node = node_chain; node != NULL; ) > > >> >> + ? ?{ > > >> >> + ? ? ?Node *next_node = node->next; > > >> >> + ? ? ?Edge_list *it; > > >> >> + ? ? ?for (it = node->edge_list; it != NULL; ) > > >> >> + ? ? ? ?{ > > >> >> + ? ? ? ? ?Edge_list *next_it = it->next; > > >> >> + ? ? ? ? ?free (it); > > >> >> + ? ? ? ? ?it = next_it; > > >> >> + ? ? ? ?} > > >> > > > >> > Write a free_edge_list function, since you do this once here and twice > > >> > below. > > >> > > > >> > -Nathan > > >> > > > >
Attachment:
patch_new.txt
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |