This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 9/20/2011 10:12 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:2011/9/20 Charles Wilson<xxx@yyy.com>:So, this would be a change in current mingw.org behavior. I *was* under the impression that this workaround for the old "can't pass empty strings across DLL boundary" problem[1] was no longer necessary in the gcc-4.x era, but I haven't tested the proposition. Was I wrong about that?
Yes. If you read last comment of the thread you are citing, then you would notice that for static-libstdc++ version the issue is still present. So to allow users to use also static-libstdc++ variant, this option is still necessary.
Thanks for the clarification. So, we (mingw.org) really should have been using this all along, to support users of -static-libstdc++
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |