Re: [C++-11] User defined literals

[Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net>]

On 09/19/2011 05:11 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 09/19/2011 04:22 AM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
> > +check_literal_operator_args( const_tree decl,
>
> Space before the (, not after.
Duh.  =:o)
> > Done.  I am now storing the numeric string along with the number and 
> > the suffix ID for numeric operators.  I'm keeping the numeric value 
> > because we need it too.
>
> Can't you store the string and the suffix, and then interpret the 
> number later if you end up calling an operator that takes the value?
I could and I thought abut it but from the wording (2.14.8 p3 and p4) it 
looks like the numeric argument gets first try, then raw literal then 
literal template.  I thought I might as well let the preprocessor do the 
numeric conversion since I'll always check it first.
> Jason
Also, I put the check in that errors if both a raw literal and a literal 
template share the same name.  That testcase now has dg stuff in it.

Ed

Attachment: patch20
Description: Text document