This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [libgomp] Pass CC to the libgomp testsuite to capture -sysroot

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>
To: Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 16:49:29 -0400
Subject: Re: [libgomp] Pass CC to the libgomp testsuite to capture -sysroot
References: <20110128163056.9AF5D1C6D15@hpgntab-ubiq73.eem.corp.google.com> <CAD_=9DQeY1cXiFTWMLAf4p39AaXFGe4Xon5X63aXacbpUe5W4w@mail.gmail.com> <D349A14C-1D84-41D5-B7C3-BE00CA73A73E@comcast.net>

On 11-09-16 16:40 , Mike Stump wrote:

On Sep 16, 2011, at 1:13 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
I would like to push this libgomp patch upstream.  We need it to pass
sysroot to GCC when testing libgomp.
I'd be curious if Ian likes this... Can one still set GCC_UNDER_TEST in the site.exp file or do other unholy things with it after your patch? I'm thinking about things like in tree testing v out of tree testing.

I don't see why not. The patch does not re-set GCC_UNDER_TEST, it just uses it whole instead of getting the compiler part. But I think I'm missing your point.

Diego.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [libgomp] Pass CC to the libgomp testsuite to capture -sysroot
  - From: Diego Novillo

References:
- [libgomp] Pass CC to the libgomp testsuite to capture -sysroot
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [libgomp] Pass CC to the libgomp testsuite to capture -sysroot
  - From: Mike Stump

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]