This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [v3] constexpr tuple

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: Daniel Krügler <daniel dot kruegler at googlemail dot com>
Cc: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 19:34:52 +0200
Subject: Re: [v3] constexpr tuple
References: <20110906172309.2e1aafb9@shotwell> <CAGNvRgAfGX0B4tDaHc72UgBSgqkCtD7Vbz-w-7qZ_+n3-V2tZw@mail.gmail.com>

On 09/07/2011 07:44 AM, Daniel Krügler wrote:

Is tuple_cat now considered conforming?
No, see:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50159

By the way, Daniel, I was considering giving that issue a try, if you have tips (or even more ;) about the implementation of the C++11 conforming tuple_cat, I'm all ears...

Thanks,
Paolo.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [v3] constexpr tuple
  - From: Christopher Jefferson

References:
- [v3] constexpr tuple
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: [v3] constexpr tuple
  - From: Daniel Krügler

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]