This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[PATCH, PR 50301] Missing checks of number of actual arguments in IPA-CP


Hi,

somehow I lost two hunks in the patch allowing IPA-CP to process
functions with variable number of arguments and one of these omissions
caused PR 50301 (416.gamess LTO miscompilation).  The two hunks check
the number of actual arguments in two places of IPA-CP which are not
executed so often and where we currently can get an out-of-bounds
VECtor failure.

Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux, I have verified gmaess
LTO-builds with it.  OK for trunk?

Thanks,

Martin


2011-09-06  Martin Jambor  <mjambor@suse.cz>

	PR middle-end/50301
	* ipa-cp.c (find_more_values_for_callers_subset): Check jump
	function index bounds.
	(perhaps_add_new_callers): Likewise.

Index: src/gcc/ipa-cp.c
===================================================================
--- src.orig/gcc/ipa-cp.c
+++ src/gcc/ipa-cp.c
@@ -2052,8 +2052,12 @@ find_more_values_for_callers_subset (str
 	  struct ipa_jump_func *jump_func;
 	  tree t;
 
+          if (i >= ipa_get_cs_argument_count (IPA_EDGE_REF (cs)))
+            {
+              newval = NULL_TREE;
+              break;
+            }
 	  jump_func = ipa_get_ith_jump_func (IPA_EDGE_REF (cs), i);
-
 	  t = ipa_value_from_jfunc (IPA_NODE_REF (cs->caller), jump_func);
 	  if (!t
 	      || (newval
@@ -2123,6 +2127,11 @@ perhaps_add_new_callers (struct cgraph_n
 		  if (!val)
 		    continue;
 
+		  if (i >= ipa_get_cs_argument_count (args))
+		    {
+		      insufficient = true;
+		      break;
+		    }
 		  jump_func = ipa_get_ith_jump_func (args, i);
 		  t = ipa_value_from_jfunc (caller_info, jump_func);
 		  if (!t || !values_equal_for_ipcp_p (val, t))


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]