This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Ada] Implementation of aspects within generic units
- From: Iain Sandoe <developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk>
- To: Arnaud Charlet <charlet at adacore dot com>
- Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Eric Botcazou <botcazou at adacore dot com>, Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 07:53:29 +0100
- Subject: Re: [Ada] Implementation of aspects within generic units
- References: <20110831094306.GA25125@adacore.com> <CAFiYyc1rHYoQ5sDcYjxnZsdV1zoQKAMn=wc8p0ZhKZ8dmABU7g@mail.gmail.com> <20110831111610.GA49689@adacore.com> <CAFiYyc1J6Y6XCLndoqCuWT8tyXnAn3SwhtsXZ9-mrJW_ZZ58jw@mail.gmail.com> <20110831150740.GC83109@adacore.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1108311551150.381@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <20110831155718.GB90456@adacore.com> <58487A02-7DE9-48DD-BAFB-D2DC4A61156B@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk> <20110831163434.GA95956@adacore.com> <EB686073-1EA1-48F4-A841-083CB590D0CB@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk>
On 31 Aug 2011, at 20:07, Iain Sandoe wrote:
On 31 Aug 2011, at 17:34, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
In particular I'd be curious to know if revision 178376 has the
failure or not.
different failure;
built with BOOT_CFLAGS="-O0 -g" ..
.. it fails debug-compare (ada/exp_ch6.o).
There are a lot of seemingly innocuous code differences (nop
insertions) masking whatever the real problem is (difficult to
compare because of the number of trivial differences).
If I touch compare and continue the bootstrap if fails building the
native tools with a gnatmake internal error
(SYSTEM_ASSERTIONS.ASSERT_FAILURE) namet.adb line 675 -- but that's
a target-specific file, right?
Sorry, misleading datum...
The failure above is the result of building with "-O0 -g"
If I build with default BOOT_CFLAGS, 178376 fails in the same wayt as
178381.
Iain