This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH, test, i386] Fix for PR50155

From: Kirill Yukhin <kirill dot yukhin at gmail dot com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 23:38:06 +0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH, test, i386] Fix for PR50155
References: <CAGs3Rfsaur61KOj5ygzK-iZa+knDxkKr5_HY6Pqnzt26Zm=1og@mail.gmail.com> <20110822191243.GB2687@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com>

Thanks for inputs.
Updated test attached.

K

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:51:19PM +0400, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
>> testsuite/ChangeLog entry:
>> 2011-08-22 ?Kirill Yukhin ?<kirill.yukhin@intel.com>
>>
>> ? ? ? ? PR target/50155
>> ? ? ? ? * gcc.target/i386/pr50155.c: New test.
>
> For the testcase, I think you want explicit -mno-avx2 if
> you want to check that vpaddd hasn't been emitted, otherwise
> anybody testing with --with-arch=corei7-avx2 tuned compiler
> ot --target_board=unix/-mavx2 will see failures.
>
> ? ? ? ?Jakub
>

Attachment: pr50155.test.patch
Description: Binary data

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH, test, i386] Fix for PR50155
  - From: Uros Bizjak

References:
- [PATCH, test, i386] Fix for PR50155
  - From: Kirill Yukhin
- Re: [PATCH, test, i386] Fix for PR50155
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]