This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Vector Comparison patch


Richard, I am trying to make sure that when vcond has {-1} and {0} it
does not trigger masking. Currently I am doing this:

Index: config/i386/i386.c
===================================================================
--- config/i386/i386.c  (revision 177665)
+++ config/i386/i386.c  (working copy)
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.
 #include "tm.h"
 #include "rtl.h"
 #include "tree.h"
+#include "tree-flow.h"
 #include "tm_p.h"
 #include "regs.h"
 #include "hard-reg-set.h"
@@ -18434,7 +18435,30 @@ ix86_expand_sse_movcc (rtx dest, rtx cmp
 {
   enum machine_mode mode = GET_MODE (dest);
   rtx t2, t3, x;
-
+  rtx mask_true;
+
+  rtvec v;
+  int units, i;
+  enum machine_mode inner;
+
+  units = GET_MODE_NUNITS (mode);
+  inner = GET_MODE_INNER (mode);
+  v = rtvec_alloc (units);
+  for (i = 0; i < units; ++i)
+    RTVEC_ELT (v, i) = gen_rtx_CONST_INT (inner, -1);
+
+  mask_true = gen_rtx_raw_CONST_VECTOR (mode, v);
+
+  fprintf (stderr, "I am here\n");
+  debug_rtx (mask_true);
+  debug_rtx (op_true);
+  if (rtx_equal_p (op_true, mask_true))
+    {
+      fprintf (stderr, "Yes it is\n");
+      emit_insn (gen_rtx_SET (VOIDmode, dest, cmp));
+      return;
+    }
+  else
   if (op_false == CONST0_RTX (mode))
     {
       op_true = force_reg (mode, op_true);


It works out the case when mask is -1 very well, however in the code
generated by the expansion I still see excessive operations:

ires = i0 < i1 ? (vector (4, int)){-1,-1,-1,-1} : (vector (4, int)){0,0,0,0};

expands to:

pcmpgtd %xmm1, %xmm0
pcmpeqd %xmm1, %xmm1
pcmpeqd %xmm1, %xmm0
movdqa  %xmm0, -24(%rsp)

Where the code
ires = i0 < i1;

using my hook expands to:
pcmpgtd %xmm1, %xmm0
movdqa  %xmm0, -24(%rsp)


So someone is putting two extra instructions there, and I cannot
really figure out who is doing that. Anyone knows how could I fix
this...


Artem.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]