This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 2/2] document ISL requirement for GCC installation

Hi,

On Sun, 14 Aug 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:

> > which would be exactly the way no distribution would use it. So please 
> > just don't bundle ISL with CLoog.
> 
> Well, I would simply have linked the bundled ISL statically into 
> libcloog.

Which would still require not exporting the (bundled) libisl symbols from 
libcloog.  Looking at the cloog git repo it doesn't seem that it knows 
anything about symbol versions (and it wouldn't help static libs anyway).

No, the only even barely sane way is for the cloog version GCC should use 
to not include a builtin copy of some stale version of isl at all.


Ciao,
Michael.
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]