RE: [wwwdocs] Announce new ARM/embedded-4_6-branch branch

["Terry Guo" <terry dot guo at arm dot com>]

Hello Gerald,

Could you please review my updated patch?

BR,
Terry

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Terry Guo [mailto:terry.guo@arm.com]
> Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2011 10:27 AM
> To: 'Gerald Pfeifer'
> Cc: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'; Richard Earnshaw; Matthew Gretton-Dann
> Subject: RE: [wwwdocs] Announce new ARM/embedded-4_6-branch branch
> 
> Ping.
> 
> BR,
> Terry
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Terry Guo [mailto:terry.guo@arm.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 3:13 PM
> > To: 'Gerald Pfeifer'
> > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Richard Earnshaw; Matthew Gretton-Dann
> > Subject: RE: [wwwdocs] Announce new ARM/embedded-4_6-branch branch
> >
> > Hi Gerald,
> >
> > Thanks for your review. Here I attached the updated one. Is it ok to
> > commit?
> >
> > BR,
> > Terry
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Gerald Pfeifer [mailto:gerald@pfeifer.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, August 08, 2011 5:43 PM
> > > To: Terry Guo
> > > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Richard Earnshaw; Matthew Gretton-Dann
> > > Subject: Re: [wwwdocs] Announce new ARM/embedded-4_6-branch branch
> > >
> > > Hi Terry,
> > >
> > > On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Terry Guo wrote:
> > > > This new branch intends to provide fixes and enhancements for GCC
> > 4.6
> > > > when used with ARM embedded cores.
> > > >
> > > > The attached patch adds documentation for this branch.
> > >
> > > thanks for thinking to document this!  This looks good modulo two
> > > notes.
> > >
> > > +  <dd>This branch provides bug-fixes, minor enhancements and
> > stability
> > > +  fixes for GCC-4.6 when used with ARM's embedded cores, such as
> the
> > > +  Cortex-R and Cortex-M processors.  Most patches will be back-
> ports
> > > +  of changes already made on trunk.  Patches should be marked with
> > the
> > > +  tag <code>[arm-embedded]</code> in the subject line.  The branch
> > is
> > > +  maintained by ARM.</dd>
> > >
> > > Would you mind making ths GCC 4.6 (without the dash), and perhaps
> > > noting which version of GCC 4.6 this is based on (or whether it
> > > tracks the general GCC 4.6 branch)?
> > >
> > > As for maintainership, we usually have individuals, not companies
> > > there.  Could you name one or two (or three)?  You can always
> adjust
> > > the list an any time later on, without any form of approval.
> > >
> > > Gerald
> > >